Becoming part of the solution

Commencing the exploration of a more profound understanding of our reality and the prevailing mainstream interpretation, it is imperative to familiarise oneself with the foundational concepts of the objective and subjective. In this essay, I elucidate the fundamentals of these two concepts, reserving the application of the My Big TOE (MBT) framework for a subsequent podcast, where Tom Campbell will delve into its intricacies.

In the vast landscape of human perception and interpretation, the concepts of “objective” and “subjective” play crucial roles in shaping our understanding of the world. These terms are fundamental to various fields, ranging from philosophy and science to art and everyday conversations. Exploring the essence of objectivity and subjectivity provides insights into the diverse ways individuals perceive and evaluate information.

When expressing oneself, objectivity refers to the quality of being unbiased, impartial, and free from personal emotions or opinions. In the pursuit of objectivity, individuals strive to observe and analyse phenomena based on facts, evidence, and verifiable data.

In science the domain of the objective extends into the realm of quantifiable physical entities. In the quest for objectivity, individuals conscientiously scrutinise and assess phenomena, relying on facts, evidence, and verifiable data. This dedication finds exemplary expression in scientific pursuits, where the goal is to uncover objective truths about the natural world through meticulous experimentation and empirical evidence, often entailing the measurement of physical phenomena.

Contrastingly, subjectivity traces its origins to personal experiences, emotions, and individual perspectives. Subjective interpretations are influenced by factors like cultural background, personal beliefs, and emotions, resulting in a diverse array of viewpoints on the same subject.

While the hard sciences, such as Physics, biology, and chemistry, prioritise objectivity, certain disciplines deemed as subjective, or soft  sciences, like anthropology, sociology, and psychology, thrive on scientists incorporating their unique perspectives and experiences  into the formulation and interpretation of hypotheses.

In the realm of scientific pursuits, where objectivity is paramount, researchers, guided by their subjective experiences  find it hard to have their voices heard. As a result conflicts between hard and soft sciences arise as the rigid objectivity demanded by hard sciences contends with the acknowledgment of subjective influences within the soft sciences

Subjectivity, also  flourishes in fields such as artistic expression. Artists infuse their creations with personal experiences and emotions, cultivating a subjective dimension that beckons a spectrum of interpretations from the audience.

The interplay between objectivity and subjectivity is also evident in fields like journalism, where the goal is to present information accurately while acknowledging the influence of individual perspectives. Striking a balance between these two elements becomes crucial for fostering a nuanced and comprehensive understanding of complex issues.

In conclusion, the concepts of objectivity and subjectivity are integral to our comprehension of the world. While objectivity strives for an unbiased and impartial understanding based on verifiable evidence, subjectivity acknowledges the influence of personal experiences and emotions. The dynamic interplay between these two concepts enriches our perspectives, fostering a deeper understanding of reality. Embracing both objectivity and subjectivity in various aspects of life enables us to navigate the complexities of human perception and interpretation.

Written by Stephen Griffin and ChatGPT